Thursday, December 11, 2008

White Supremacist Leader Indicted on Federal Charges for Threats, Witness Intimidation

ROANOKE, Va. —  A white supremacist leader has been indicted on federal changes for making threats to five individuals and attempting to intimidate witnesses in a federal housing discrimination lawsuit, the Justice Department announced Thursday.
William White, the self-proclaimed commander of the neo-Nazi group the American National Socialist Workers Party, was charged with five counts of communicating threats in interstate commerce, one count of communicating an extortionate threat in interstate commerce and one count of witness intimidation.

The 31-year-old was also recently indicted in the Northern District of Illinois for soliciting the murder of a former federal juror.

The new indictment alleges that, from late 2006 through mid 2008, White terrorized individuals with whom he disagreed on either racial or personal issues. He is accused of making late-night telephone calls to the victims' homes, writing victims threatening e-mails and posting victims' contact and personal information on neo-Nazi Web sites, sometimes accompanied by language advocating their murder.

He also allegedly sent letters to the homes of individuals involved in a federal housing discrimination lawsuit which included racial epithets and threatened consequences for their participation in the suit.
If found guilty, White faces a maximum of 55 years in prison as well as a potential fine of up to $250,000 for each charge.

1 comment:

Heywood said...

Freedom Reversed

I was reading that web site prior to the FBI taking it down, so no one could see the truth.

White continually said off the wall comments but he also always came back afterward and said that he does not agree with violence within the group.

I can assure you White does not have the God like power to say something and control someone like a hypnotist would.

This is a blatant violation of the constitution. People should have the ability to say things that you do not agree with without being imprisoned for it. You have a God given right to be an idiot if you wish.

Physically harming someone is a completely different thing because at that point you are playing God and deciding what will happen with his or her life. No one was ever physically harmed in any way by White.

It is a shame that there are a small group of liberal extremists out there that believe that the constitution should be changed. They have even taken it to the point where in Virginia, if you swear at someone you are a criminal and can be jailed for "curse and abuse". The police in Virginia take this law to their advantage and continually charge people for this. Charged with a crime for a heated argument! I would also strongly suggest not flipping the bird to anyone on Virginia roads. They have laws for that as well and you will be arrested!

On the other hand getting in a physical fight and harming someone is a misdemeanor charge. You can get a thousand misdemeanor charges before you see one day in prison.

The next thing you know, you say something about the government you will be imprisoned for it. Your charges will be inciting the government. They will convince the public through the media that boat rockers are the reason that we can't fix things and they need to be punished for doing so. That they cause unnecessary turmoil and if you don’t have something nice to say, don’t say anything at all.

They will start by taking down the really big boat rockers like AM radio and will act like they are the only reason for the law. They will develop a defense to prove that they are a harm to the welfare of the country and they will pull their defense out of years of programs recorded.

They will concurrency have a campaign going on TV that goes along the lines of "why can't we just all get along" and how good the civilization will be by doing so.

They will be able to do better than this with a lot of thought put into it. This is just off the top of my head based on things they have done historically. By the end of their campaign, you will be convinced that we are better off without boat rockers.

5 to 10 years down the road they will have already expanded that law to include the average Joe that expressed his negative opinions about all of congress being on "the take" of large corporations and foreign governments. Or "Joe" expressed his dislike of the federal government doing things against the will of the American people. And that he felt that congress should have short term limits so we don’t get into the position of them taking advantage of the American people due to long relationships developed and the “good old boy system” code of conduct they go by.

Joe knows that presently the politicians when elected are elected for life as long as they clean up their act a couple of months prior to each election. The American people are either unknowledgeable of what is going on or they forgive and forget. This is obvious by how congress had an 11 percent approval rating and 95% of them were voted back in. The others retired and left willingly. Joe knows how during this 11 percent approval rating 2 people were chosen to be president and they both happened to be congressmen.

Joe thinks that it is common sense to give them term limits. He doesn’t feel that he is really rocking the boat, just expressing some negative opinions on how he doesn’t agree with the Feds.

The Feds will say, we didn't lock him up for what he said, we locked him up for the way he said it. He said that we should consider overthrowing the government and taking back our country. This is the largest violation of the anti boat rocking laws that we have had in a long while.

Your rights in America get slowly taken away. The next thing you know you are no longer free and you live in a highly guarded police state. We already have 1% of the population locked up, most of which for non-violent crimes.